:
By: Collin J. Hite
Corporate depositions are rarely routine. They are often the juncture where cases are won, lost, or settled on unfavorable terms. A poorly prepared corporate representative can unintentionally hand opposing counsel damaging admissions, sound bites, or themes that distort the record. By contrast, a well-prepared witness, supported by a disciplined litigation team and robust documentation can safely navigate even the most aggressively noticed depositions.
Below is a “Top 10” list of the most common deposition landmines—and how counsel can neutralize them before they explode.
10. Your Documentation Is Your Bomb‑Proof Vest
A robust set of documents form the foundation of a successful corporate deposition. Thin or inconsistent files invite speculation, allowing opposing counsel to fill in gaps with unfavorable assumptions. Perception can quickly become reality in testimony.
Business stakeholders must manage expectations early and clearly with outside counsel: thorough reporting, contemporaneous notes, clear explanations for time gaps, and disciplined document retention are essential. If nothing is happening in the record, the record should say so—and explain why. Protective orders should be secured wherever possible, especially for sensitive internal materials, to reduce unnecessary exposure and use in subsequent lawsuits (especially for defendants).
9. Narrow and Clear Topics
Deposition topics are often wildly overbroad. A notice referencing “the file” or similarly vague categories are not just unhelpful—they can also be dangerous. Witnesses cannot reasonably prepare for such topics, and an “I don’t know” answer may later be portrayed as a failure to prepare, potentially exposing the organization to sanctions or at least a follow-up deposition.
Counsel must force a meaningful meet‑and‑confer to narrow and clarify topics. Precise topics allow focused preparation, legitimate objections, and protection from improper questioning outside the scope of designation. Clear topics help ensure testimony remains factual testimony, not unintended corporate admissions.
8. Prepare, Prepare, Prepare
Preparation is not optional. Corporate depositions are minefields, and there is no substitute for robust witness preparation. Counsel should assemble a concise, carefully curated binder of the most relevant documents—avoiding the temptation to overwhelm the witness with hundreds of pages.
Ideally, witnesses should receive documents in advance and have time to review them thoroughly before formal preparation sessions begin. Witnesses must also be encouraged to identify internal employees they consulted to confirm facts. Saying “I only spoke to my lawyer” can become powerful impeachment material. Preparation should also include rehearsing “easy” questions, which frequently cause the most visible discomfort when unpracticed.
7. Mocking Is Disarming the Landmine
Effective preparation requires multiple sessions over at least two weeks. A common and effective structure includes an initial session focused on documents and case theory, followed by intensive mock depositions, and a final all‑mock session the day before testimony. Unless the witness is superb, and few are, at least three preparation sessions is warranted. The first focuses on the documents and theory of the case. This is best if in person. The second, which can be on video conference, wraps up the documents and then moves into mock deposition practice. The witness needs to truly understand what is coming. The final session, the day before the actual deposition, is a robust mock session that runs through the entire expected deposition.
Mock questioning should be iterative—start, stop, critique, and repeat. Videotaping practice sessions can be especially powerful, helping witnesses see how demeanor, tone, and body language come across. When necessary, a neutral witness consultant can help overcome resistance or perspective gaps.
6. Zoom Is Both Friend and Foe
Remote depositions are attractive to opposing counsel because they are cheaper and easier to schedule, but they introduce serious risks. A corporate witness should never be allowed to appear remotely without defense counsel physically present even if the attorney taking the deposition is remote. Witnesses get too comfortable when alone on video, and that is where trouble occurs.
The setting must remain formal and controlled. Witnesses should never volunteer to access or produce documents from their own devices during testimony. Counsel should demand exhibits in advance, both to prepare the witness and to gain insight into opposing counsel’s case themes. While opposing counsel may struggle with remote exhibits, that inconvenience should not come at the expense of the witness’s protection.
How the deposition will proceed on video conference should be negotiated in advance. Will defending counsel have hard copies of exhibits in the event of technical issues or an inability to navigate them on screen. What device will the witness use to access the video conference feed. Often when there are multiple people on the feed and exhibits are being shared, it can be difficult to review exhibits on a small laptop screen. No one wants to fight over these technical issues at the start of the deposition, and it is not fair to the witness in any regard.
5. “Depends” Is Not Just an Adult Diaper
Opposing counsel often attempts to elicit rigid rules or hypotheticals that create damaging sound bites. Witnesses should never engage in hypotheticals unless carefully trained to do so. The witness is present to discuss the noticed and agreed upon topics.
When hypotheticals cannot be avoided, “it depends” is a legitimate and often critical answer—provided the witness is trained to explain why it depends. Practicing hypotheticals in advance helps witnesses recognize traps and avoid unintentionally creating admissions. It is rare that two files or scenarios are alike, which makes it very rare that how one matter was handled is a guide to the one at issue.
4. Three Themes Provide a Safe Path Through the Minefield
Witnesses need safe harbors. Limiting testimony to three core themes allows witnesses to stay grounded, consistent, and aligned with the organization’s position.
Themes give uncertain witnesses a place to land and reduce the risk of damaging tangents. Strong corporate witnesses can even become advocates over time, skillfully fitting answers within thematic boundaries while remaining truthful. Anticipating and countering opposing counsel’s themes is equally important.
3. Build Your Own Minefield First
When used consistently, core themes deny opposing counsel clean sound bites. Combined with careful use of “it depends,” they force nuance and context into the record.
Depositions are not merely discovery tools—they are leverage. Because most cases will never reach trial, deposition testimony often drives settlement value. Saving the “good stuff” for trial may mean no one ever hears it. A strong deposition record can reshape litigation dynamics entirely as well as frame the strength of settlement negotiations.
2. Assemble the Best Landmine Disposal Team
Successful depositions depend on alignment between in-house counsel, the corporate witness, and outside counsel. All must agree on expectations, preparation time, and the importance of the deposition.
Organizations should develop and maintain a bench of repeat corporate witnesses. Familiarity improves performance, reduces prep time over the long term, and strengthens credibility. Importantly, the Federal Rules do not require the “most knowledgeable” witness—only one who can testify to information known or reasonably available to the organization. Selecting witnesses who present well, commit time to preparation, and perform credibly on video is essential.
1. You Are the General—Empower the Battalion
Depositions are too important for half‑measures. Companies must empower outside counsel to devote the necessary time and resources to preparation. Cost‑cutting decisions that undermine deposition strategy—such as defaulting to Zoom or rushing prep—are often false economies. Spending the time and money to prepare and execute a well-presented witness will pay dividends in the case.
With only a small percentage of cases ever reaching trial, depositions are the game. Poorly prepared witnesses step on landmines that dramatically increase exposure and settlement value. Leadership must set the tone by treating depositions as mission‑critical events.
Key Takeaways
Preparation is essential. There simply is no room for generic or casual deposition preparation of any witness, but this is especially true of corporate representatives. The witness’ testimony will bind the company.
Selecting the right corporate designee matters. Too many companies go looking for a corporate witness with each new deposition notice. Ideally, any company involved in a lot of litigation would have a few designated witnesses to use in rotation. They get more comfortable with the process and usually become better each time. It also makes the preparation sessions more efficient.
Narrowing and defining deposition topics is critical. Usually, it should take a minimum of four weeks to be able to present a corporate witness. Why? Because the first week or two is spent to meet and confer over the topics. Get them narrowed and agreed upon so the witness can prepare accurately and not get caught in a game of “gotcha, you did not properly prepare.”
About the author
Collin J. Hite is president of Hite Insurance Consulting, LLC. He also is litigation & insurance counsel at Conservice, LLC. hiteconsulting@icloud.com